One connected investigation
Shipment records, customer commitments, and carrier capacity are checked together.
Bring your data, people, and AI agents together. Investigate a problem, review the next move, and build the workflows and software to carry it forward.
Connect the systems you already use. Give people and agents the same business picture, with clear permissions when it is time to act.
A shipment is connected to its customer, contract, carrier, and delivery promise. Pascal brings those relationships together so people and agents can work from the same context.
Give an agent an objective. Let it investigate, prepare a plan, and bring the right person in when a decision is needed. The conversation, sources, and resulting work stay together.
Define who can read, decide, and act. Review consequential changes before they happen, then inspect the result in the system that owns the record.

Model the business, prepare the data, coordinate the work, and put agents to use. Governance connects all four layers.
Connect customers, assets, orders, and the relationships between them. Give applications and agents a shared business model while keeping the original systems in place.
Prepare reusable datasets, query them in SQL, run calculations, and develop predictions. Keep source history, quality, and access rules attached to the data.
Coordinate processes across people and systems. Investigate exceptions, compare responses, and build reusable functions around the same business objects and permissions.
Give agents clear assignments and relevant knowledge. Work together in shared rooms, preserve useful decisions, and evaluate what the next version should improve.
Set access, review consequential changes, and confirm what happened across the whole platform.
Start with a job your team already needs to do. Explore an operating example or the product that supports it.
Find the captured response, inspect the calls behind it, and carry the evidence into an investigation.
Compare the same cases across versions. Review regressions and missing results before deciding what to change.
Find affected customer promises, compare recovery routes, and review the plan before carriers are reassigned.
Bring usage, support history, and renewal dates into one plan with an owner for each next step.
Turn a business requirement into an application, with source, checks, preview, and release review connected.
Trace financial claims back to source documents. Surface discrepancies before the investment review.
Identify affected procedures and control limits. Prepare a validation plan and route it to the right reviewers.
Gather the sources, compare their findings, and keep uncertainty visible in the resulting analysis.
Give a team one place to find the records that need attention, inspect context, and take the next action.
Bring records and events into Pascal, then make approved actions available to workflows and agents.
Transform source records, check data quality, and provide a maintained dataset for downstream work.
Coordinate the steps between teams and systems, including waits, approvals, and recovery when a step fails.
Compare candidates against an operational objective and inspect the quality, cost, and failure cases.
Keep the sources, rationale, and result connected so the next investigation can build on prior work.
In this illustrative recovery, a carrier failure affects 42 shipments. Pascal connects the commitments, fallback capacity, and required approvals in one investigation.
Shipment records, customer commitments, and carrier capacity are checked together.
These shipments risk missing the 21:00 UTC cutoff. The team compares fallback capacity before acting.
The lithium shipments require their own Compliance decision and stay outside the approved reroute scope.
The operator approves the eligible reroutes. Pascal keeps the confirmation and follow-up work with the decision.
The scenario projects zero new breaches under its assumptions. Later shipment events must establish the actual service outcome.
Scope the data and tools available to each person and agent.
Bring a consequential change to the person responsible for the decision.
Inspect what changed, what failed, and what still needs attention.
Choose a workflow that crosses teams or systems. Let’s connect the context, decisions, and tools it needs.